Thursday, February 27, 2020

2 page-paper brief for a case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

2 page-paper brief for a case - Essay Example SDI defendants aggressively marketed a test for diagnosing a common sleep disorder. According to an affidavit sworn by IRS Special Agent Julie Raftery, they at times billed twice for their services and made reward payments to doctors who participated in their tests. The US government claims that SDI employees who were in participating physicians’ offices would persuade patients to take part in a sleep study. As the cardiac diagnostic companies doing business with SDI would claim to complete a report of the results of the sleep studies, SDI staff would put fake stamps bearing the signatures of physicians reports. SDI would then recommend that a patient should take part in further studies, in which the patient’s health insurer would pay for them. The affidavit revealed cases of suspected tax fraud. At the end of a 2 year investigation led by the Internal Revenue Service with the active participation of 4 other federal and state agencies, investigators concluded that SDI F uture Health, Inc. had committed Medicare fraud. Based on the results gotten from the investigation, IRS Special Agent Julie Raftery sought for a warrant to search SDIs premises on January 28, 2002. The warrant was based on an affidavit which had information collected from 3 former employees and 2 associates of SDI.  Whether the warrant incorporated Special Agent Rafterys affidavit can be evaluated to check if it meets [the Fourth Amendments] requirements. If incorporated, then the affidavit should be evaluated to see if it satisfies deficiencies in the warrant. The SDI defendants also purportedly forced patients to make visits to SDI clinics, and told them that their assigned doctors had asked them to participate in the sleep studies. The US government states that Kaplan and Brunk lack a base to challenge the search and collection of materials from SDI’s premises. According to the government, a corporate defendant has standing with respect to searches of corporate property and

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

Plasma International and Blood Plasma Transfusions Case Study

Plasma International and Blood Plasma Transfusions - Case Study Example Blood most especially the one provided through donations by third world countries at a low price should not be sold back to them at exorbitant prices. Blood should be available to anyone at any time without charge or obligation because donors don’t gain preference over non-donors. I don’t agree with the writer because human blood, just like any other human body part should come at a price. People pay to replace their kidneys, arms, eyes knees even heart valves. Just like blood other body parts are as important so I don’t see why when it comes to the donation of blood it should be different. Just because blood comes from human who can continuously produce more, doesn’t mean one can collect it freely(Zimmer.Preston n.d) There are many things involved before, during and after someone is transfused with blood that is costly. Starting with purchasing needles, collection bags, sterilizers, vacuum containers, equipment for laboratory testing to verify the purity of the blood. Medical practitioners, as well as the supplies they use like lab coats, latex gloves, and protective equipment, need to be purchased. Also, transportation cost from the donor to the recipient should not be left out. According to me, it’s not unethical if the company k eeps the price to receive donor blood affordable to the recipient. And as long as it operates legally, it’s fine with me. After all, medicine nowadays is profit generating as any other. The existence of blood market does not threaten the right to donate freely (Zimmer.Preston (n.d) There are facts that contradict my argument, the fact that marketing threatens all rights to receive freely donated blood. The commercialization of blood discourages voluntary blood donors; someone will be reluctant to donate freely knowing very well that someone will be financially profitable out of it (Paying donors and the ethics of blood supply. n.d.).  Still, it seems likely that  when suppliers get paid, the would-be non-cash donor losses the sense that their contribution is necessary (Güceri, Fridman   & North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2008).Â